The National Development and Reform Commission issued the Review Rules on Fair Competition in the Field of Bidding (Draft for Public Comment).The content mainly includes the implementation of the national unified market access conditions, the autonomy of bidding, integrity (credit) evaluation measuresSeven aspects。
01
Ensure the tenderer's autonomy in choosing the trading system
Electronic trading platforms, trading tools, which should be independently chosen by transaction promoters and fair competition among market players in the service supply fieldIn the vast majority of regions, it is still refused by the relevant departments for various reasons and in various ways to carry out bidding and bidding business in accordance with the law on the third-party electronic trading platform。The electronic trading platform should involve market players in service supply, so as to realize market competition and market allocation of resources。However, in fact, the third-party electronic trading platform is facing difficulties in opening up, docking, development and other related problems, which seriously affect and restrict the marketization, specialization, and intelligent development of bidding and procurement electronic trading, and it is necessary to vigorously clean up and eliminate the iron walls that hinder the docking of third-party electronic trading platforms。
02
Ensure that the tenderer chooses the agency and prepares the bid documentsautonomy
The Rules are clearIt may not be formulated or implementedThe following restrictions:
1. Appoint an agency for the tenderer or limit the way in which the tenderer chooses an agency;
2. Specify bidding qualifications, technology and business conditions for the tenderer;
3. Specify the qualification examination method or bid evaluation method for the tenderer;
4. Specify bid evaluation criteria for the tenderer;
5. Specify the bid opening time for the tenderer;
6. Circumstances in which the tenderer's autonomy is restricted by other unreasonable conditions。
The preparation of bidding documents is the right of autonomy enjoyed by the tenderer according to law。Paragraph 1 of Article 19 of the Tendering and Bidding Law expressly stipulates that a tenderer shall prepare bidding documents according to the characteristics and needs of the project to be tendered。In practice, many local administrative supervision departments, industry competent departments and even public resource trading operation service agencies have issued regulations that the evaluation standards and evaluation methods of the bidding documents are detailed to each item, and the tenderer and the bidding agency can not have any changes。On the one hand, this practice seriously infringes the autonomy of the tenderer to prepare the bidding documents, on the other hand, it is not conducive to the realization of the tenderer's procurement objectives。
03
Ensure the tenderer pricing bid
In practice, some places force tenderers to adopt "assessment separation" and "double-blind review", prohibit tenderers to appoint representatives or entrust external experts to participate in bid evaluation as representatives of tenderers, and force the formation of bid selection committees, etc., directly depriving or reducing the legitimate rights and interests of tenderers。
04
Ensure the right of the tenderer to collect bid security
In practice, some places prohibit the tenderer from collecting bid security, performance security and quality security in accordance with the law, resulting in disputes in the conclusion and performance of the contract, the legitimate rights and interests of the tenderer can not be protected, which is not conducive to the smooth progress of the project。At this stage, the credit system has not been completely established, it is not advisable to prohibit the tenderer to collect the deposit according to law。
05
Ensure the tenderer's right of independent credit evaluation
The Rules are clearIt may not be formulated or implementedThe following restrictions:
(1) Adopt different evaluation standards for business entities in different regions or forms of ownership in terms of qualification, qualification and performance;
2, in the registration process of material submission, upload, review and other business entities in different regions or forms of ownership to make different provisions;
3. Compel the tenderer to adopt a specific good faith (credit) evaluation conclusion when setting the bidding qualification conditions;
4. Force the tenderer to take the specific integrity (credit) evaluation conclusion as the bid evaluation standard;
5. Other circumstances that have the effect of local protection or ownership discrimination;
06
Formulate standard bidding documents and treat all types of business entities equally
07
Ensure all business entities平等参与
The Rules are clearIt may not be formulated or implementedThe following restrictions:
1, the bidding and bidding transaction service agencies to exercise administrative supervision and management functions with the nature of examination and approval, filing, supervision, punishment, etc.;
2. Force non-public resource trading projects to enter the public resource trading platform;
3. For matters that can be verified by informing commitment and post-verification, the bidder shall be forced to provide the original in the bidding process;
4. Illegally requiring the bidder's legal representative, technical person in charge or other specific personnel to be present in the process of obtaining bidding documents and opening bids;
(5) Other improper restrictions on the participation of business entities in the bidding process。
From: Today Public Resources Information network
All rights reserved:Kaifeng city public resources trading information networkHost: Kaifeng public resources trading information network
Address: Kaifeng City citizens home 5th floor 邮编:475000 Email: kfggzyjyzx2018@163.com Website record number:Yu ICP prepared No. 12001764-1
Technical support:Zhengzhou Xinyuan Information Technology Co., LTD